If you were forced to harm a random person or your pet, which would you choose?
I'd choose a person. I could never harm my dogs
Edit: I think we should have a "pets lives matter" campaign.
-
Neither, there's innocent people out there, and I love my cats. Truth, there are more innocent people than you think, and animals, wow people who kill animals are really bad.
-
It really depends on the definition of harm
-
1 RespuestaEditado por Hellbent02: 11/7/2015 11:55:47 AMCan't I just harm a person without giving a choice? Seriously though, I'd hurt a person over a pet any day of the week. Now had you made the choice between a human family member or pet that might be different....though distant cousins would be hurt before pets.
-
If I were to choose one person, it would be Donald Trump
-
-
1 RespuestaYou can at least explain your actions to a random person and they'll be able to understand what you say, but, towards your pet, they'll forever be lost on why you did it.
-
3 RespuestasI would hurt my pet rock
-
I could earn that person's respect again.
-
1 RespuestaPeople by a large margin
-
I would murder the person and walk away and that's all I don't have a pet but they don't know that
-
Define harm
-
15 RespuestasSo you would kill or harm a person but not a dog? *slow clap* People are retarded
-
1 RespuestaMy cats are stupid... but I don't like people. This is hard.
-
-
It depends. If the person is some random person or an inferior, then it's no better if I hit the animal.
-
There are definitely a few people that I know that would deserve to get hit.
-
Person. No doubt
-
Person. There's no doubt about it.
-
1 RespuestaI'd choose a person since people are not innocent. Animals or pets are innocent
-
persons
-
A person
-
3 RespuestasPerson. -blam!- people! Dogs are much better than people.
-
Pets trust you. People are assholes
-
I dont have a pet so loophole
-
-
A person, easily