[quote]1. Destiny was promoted as a 10 year experience, but with TTK, it seems that this was a bit misleading. 10 x 1 year games is more accurate.[/quote]Making Year 1 content obsolete is brutal. I can understand this for the second retail release, but not a DLC.[quote]2. Bungie are under pressure (from Activision) to keep revenue up.[/quote]You know they are. Activision pays the bills, not us consumers.[quote]Bungie make it very difficult sometimes to help us actually play games (e.g. no matchmaking) [/quote]The complaints about lack of matchmaking will only end when Bingie adds matchmaking for all activities.[quote]4. The community is dwindling, making it increasingly hard to play the game[/quote]I observe fewer players this week, because now we all know our exports are pointless. When you start up a strike or PoE 28, and can't match with 2 other players, then you know the population is untenable. [quote]7. No ascenscion of old legendaries essentially makes most of the year one Destiny redundant [/quote]Year 1 became redundant as soon as Bungie made clear that Year 1 gear would not ascend, breaking the meta-game, and putting an expiration date on player progression. [quote]by year 10 the game won't actually be any bigger than it is now in terms of end game activities as each year the old stuff will become obsolete.[/quote]This ties into OP's first point. The grand experience was sold on the idea that you could to take your Guardian through a 10 year adventure, but if you replace all the guns and gear every year, is it really the same Guardian? Could you start Mass Effect: Andromeda and get the same feeling you'd get from Destiny 2? [quote]It is worth noting that adding matchmaking and allowing ascension of year 1 legendaries would solve several of the issue above[/quote]100% agree.