{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Editado por Stupid Shinji:
7/26/2015 3:49:03 PM
15
You're a funny guy, since art is defined by both the artist and by the beholder, you do not define what art is, so painting classic cars isn't art? Many use stencils for their graphics then paint them, designing computer graphics with a mouse isn't art? You can't define art from the perspective of one who does not understand what art truly is, I saw you claim to be a pianist, if you're not composing your own music all you are is a mimic in your own opinion then.
English
-
Moving a brush over a gun for 5 minutes is not art
-
So it takes 5 minutes? You've painted one? You made one? No? So you're guessing it takes 5 minutes? If you knew anything about paint you would know that many of them are painted in acrylic and that takes a lot of actual time and effort. You're speaking about something you obviously do not understand, and the fact that you skipped over my final piece in there proves you're so artist lol
-
Music is different there's something that you add from yourself- the way you play, you do things no other does. You change things, even if the original notes aren't yours. It's called "interpretation". Look it up.
-
So art is interpreted by creator in your own words? lol your post just fell apart cx
-
Editado por MichaelO26M: 7/26/2015 4:07:18 PMHow the F did my post fall apart? Music is self-interpreted, while painting an already existant model is not.
-
Give 500 models of that thorn, to 500 different people, and tell them to paint it. I gurantee each one will be different than the rest, because they painted theirs how they think it should look like.
-
I know. But it's all painted the same. There is not personal interpretation in painting it exactly like thw thorn in the game. Show me someone who painted it differently.
-
Yes its all going to look somewhat the same, but they will all be different in their own ways, different shades of grey, shading in different areas, black in different spots.
-
If they will be handed an image of the Thorn, no.
-
So your saying every hand painted thorn would look exactly the same? Every minute detail? If you say yes, im done.
-
Lol no you got me wrong... of course if everyone did what he wanted it would br different. Even if they are given an image of it, it will be different. But the people who did it and posted tried on purpose (and succeeded) to make it look exactly like the "real" thorn, which I think, is not called art. Mimicing and copying other's work (even if it's not exactly the same product), is not art.
-
That is your opinion lol that's your personal interpretation. The art world would disagree with you, so the masses in the art world would interpret a person taking the hours and hours it would take to first get their model perfect, then recreate the colors of an image by hand as art. Your opinion is no more valid or final than the next person, as a pianist you should understand that art is an interpretation, and everyone's interpretation will be different depending on their artistic views and preferences. So you say an opinion is wrong based on your opinion?
-
Painting over lines from an image isn't art. Why do you keep saying that? Lol
-
So doing a custom paint job on a car isn't art?
-
COSTUM, ok. Blades, flames, [u][b]personally drawn, [/b][/u] yes. Other than that, no.
