Setting the scene, we're running the ROC strike, Sepiks Prime. Started out with three of us, the first guy pretty much left straight away (fair enough). So me and the other guy just crack on. We quickly progress to Sepiks, got Sepiks halfway down on health when the other guy disconnects. Feeling bad for the other guy I crack on bringing Sepiks to a fraction of its health when two randoms are dropped into the team (this doesn't bother me). Sepiks dies shortly after, when I notice the two other guys that only joined the fireteam ended up with various legendary items!! WTF I thought to myself! Is this really RNG!? I've seen it far too often, players with the least amount of involvement, least kills, lowest score, most deaths are bestowed with the best rewards! Don't get me wrong I'm not complaining about the two other guys that just got dropped into a game by the matchmaker, there's nothing they can do about that! But Bungies 'RNG' is sending out the wrong signals, it rewards the lowest scoring players more often than the highest scoring. So on the basis of that logic what's the point in playing properly, because technically you could do literally nothing in a raid, strike or crucible match and be given a big 'special' Bungie pat on the back when it comes to the reward screen! [b]TL : DR[/b] Bitching about RNG: The highest scoring players at the end of the game should be given the chance of better rewards through RNG, not the lowest scoring players! [b]EDIT[/b]: I suggest a slight change to RNG where the best performers in a raid, strike, crucible match are given an increased chance through RNG the likelyhood of better rewards. This would also eliminate the AFK'ers in raids, strikes and matches! If there's no reward for not participating it would force players to at least try and participate. In my eyes this only seems fair but only IMHO.