I'm not refuting the op's points. I made it clear in my first sentence that some were quite good. Just taking the time to point out the fallacy in some of his arguments.
English
-
You also said some werent well reseached. I dont see how anything in your post really counters anything the OP said. If anything, your response isnt well researched
-
The point in particular I felt was poorly researched, was the op's assumption that Joe Slaten had spent six year writing only the plot for the game, I detailed my reasoning clearly in my post to that effect. As I said before though, I did not seek to "counter" the argument about the locked content, only that he presented it in a way that wasn't as strong as it could have been.