I can't tell. The game looks really mediocre, but it seems like the media is force feeding this down everyone's throats. It's just Call of Duty but now mechs! (but wait, they're not mechs, they're titans).
-
2 RepliesIt looks like a futuristic Battlefield to me, can't wait to try it out.
-
1 ReplyIt looks good, but it sure as hell isn't worth a $500 console. That is my problem with the PS4 and Xbox One, since neither is backwards compatible the games just aren't worth the high price tag. They look good, but 2 games isn't worth it if you have to spend $600.
-
I am pumped!
-
3 RepliesIt looks really smooth. And, it's from the creators of MW2, the best COD. So it can't be all that bad. But it was the best thing at E3 this year. Everything else was meh...
-
Edited by BADMAGIK: 8/6/2013 8:35:18 PM>Former COD devs =COD >Has guns = COD >Play as soldier = COD >Has mechs that hold guns = COD with mechs [b]YOU ARE ALL -blam!-ING RETARDED![/b]
-
Looks alright. If it comes to ps4 or 360 I'll get it.
-
I wouldn't say excited, but I'm definitely interested.
-
Hmm, let me think that over. Do I like massive robots fighting each other in a story driven MP? I was sold At robots :)
-
1 ReplyI think it's really overrated. People declaring it game of E3 and calling it a true Next Gen game. It's a standard CODxMech game.
-
I think you don't have a 3rd necessary option. Titanfall looks to be fun but is nowhere near looking as amazing as people are making it out to be. Its men with guns that can pilot mechs that act like men with guns.
-
It seems fun from what I saw I gameplay trailers, but I'm not waking up screaming! Screaming! Just because it still needs to be released...
-
It looks fun but im not going crazy waiting for it.
-
What am falls for titans?
-
4 RepliesDestiny looks mediocre.
-
6 RepliesI forgot that Call of Duty had double jumping, parkour, and seamless mech combat... As the guy below me said, if you want to say Titanfall is CoD, then Battlefield is just CoD with vehicles and Halo CoD without iron sights. It's the small fundamental gameplay differences that differentiate games from each other.
-
1 ReplyEdited by The Great DanTej: 8/3/2013 12:37:49 AM[quote] (but wait, they're not mechs, they're titans).[/quote]Wait, so are you going to start complaining about everything that has a name? "but wait, It's not a tank, it's a scorpion!" "but wait, It's not a space elf, it's an eldar!" "but wait, It's not a giant monster, it's a colossus!" This is the kind of nitpicking that I can't even begin to comprehend.
-
It basically looks like what MW looked like back then- innovative.
-
Edited by Forge Fan92: 8/3/2013 2:59:29 AMI really don't get the hype for it. I'll save myself the 60 bucks on the game that the Flood will despise once it comes out.
-
Well I like CoD and mechs sounds awesome.
-
Question: Have you seen Titanfall? Have you seen CoD? Then, bar the fact they're both FPS, how're they the same? I'll put it this way, mechs, jetpacks and lightning cannons. If these things do not encourage you to be interested in a game then you need to reevaluate your priorities.
-
Hell yeah!!!
-
Looks like CoD with a little more innovation and mechs.
-
I'm excited.
-
Not at all, its another modern competitve fps. Which unless somehow it breaks the trend equates to being something I have no interest in at all.
-
2 RepliesI'm more excited for Halo 9.
-
3 RepliesEhh, to me doesn't look that amazing.