probably because youre a shotgunner or better witha shotgun than with a sniper... A sniper meta is easier to play in than a shotty meta... Just dont peak lanes, problem solved
English
-
Negative. Two or three snipers working in coordination can lockdown a map that doesn't have any protected flanking routes in 6v6 match. Which then forces you to stand back and snipe was well...or else get absolutely wrecked. Because you LITERALLY can't move around the map without getting your head blown off. But then trying to outsnipe someone who snipes as their game...is also a recipie for getting beaten. Which is why people hated the sniper meta. OTOH, People can shotgun warrior all day...and I can still play my own game. I just need to make sure that CQC is covered. FYI, my pvp kills come from hand cannons and pulse rifles. For me a shotgun is strictly a situational weapon.
-
Negative. You can check my pvp kills. I use my primary more than anything, but when it comes to special: #1 sniper #2 fusion #3 shottys #4 sidearms I would just prefer to counter shotgunners rather than snipers, especially because i tend to use close-range primaries.
-
hmm, i find it much harder to counter a jugg running titan with a full auto matador than a sniper sitting in the back.. that might just be me tho
-
Even when i do use shottys, i was never a fan of the matador/party crasher/last ditch archtype. I prefer the higher rof shotguns, such as immobius or the proud spire... but that's just me. I'll occasionally run a last ditch on my warlock, because the melee range makes it easier to get that follow-up kill. Typically I like using the susanoo on my warlock though
-
but see that would be good , if they could make low impact high RoF shotguns a viable option... it's just getting annoying that in order to be competitive you just use a handful of guns when there are so many options
-
High RoF shotguns are better but u run out of ammo too fast. Give invective a try it's crazy
-
Ur probably just bad ;)
-
probably tbh