{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/23/2015 11:39:03 PM
2
Can't tell...would've liked an image of the perk trees. They're wording isn't too great.
For looks, omolon looks coolest.
English
-
From what I've gathered, it's like this: Hakke: Minor changes that all focus on forward combat. Minimal changes; basic attack-based Omolon: Perks change weapon behaviour rather than stats, meaning it could make each weapon much more unique. Major changes; perks "evolve" (my own choice of word) the weapon Suros: Perk changes focus on versatility/stats rather than behaviour, so weapons can be focus on different situations based on which perks you choose. Middling changes; perks are situationally-based
-
I'm wondering if they're redesigning [i]all[/i] the perks, and not reusing any of the older ones. Curious as to what perks like smallbore, headseeker, hidden hand, tripod, third eye, etc are considered. O.O
