{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
3/2/2015 10:47:47 PM
7
Typical American shoot to kill cops.
[spoiler]sigh..why am I not surprised[/spoiler]
English
-
Well if someone gets ahold of a weapon with the intent of causing physical harm and won't let go even after being tased and the sorts, I believe it's justified for the safety of the police and bystanders.
-
I guess they're trained to kill and not disarm/aim (corruption I suppose)
-
Edited by NO_IM_DANIEL: 3/3/2015 7:49:40 PMPolice don't shoot to kill they shoot to stop the threat. When someone takes an officers gun you are no going to try and take that gun away, that's a suicide mission, you are going to shoot that person to stop the threat.
-
Absolutely correct, no one is going to wrestle with an armed suspect. It will almost always end with a shot being discharged which will hit either a cop or a bystander. The police did what they felt was the safest and quickest way to disarm to suspect which unfortunately ended a life but provided complete safety for the others. Im on the polices side on this one.
-
Finally someone with common sense!
-
I know right! Some people are just completely clueless on how these things work!
-
Yep, the criticize the police when they know absolutely nothing of what happened, then they spread false reports of what happened. People need to get the facts before they comment.
