{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by YetAnotherPotato:
3/12/2014 2:03:56 PM
21
Hey look Master Chief was defeated by Captain America
Just go read the comment section on this video.
So much rage because Captain America defeated Master Chief haha
They are raising valid points such as [quote]Bull shit cheif would not have gone down that easly he took a direct necular blast[/quote] and [quote]Fuck you bulshit captin kill chef never will happen [/quote] and [quote]BULLSHIT WTF MASTER chieft is stronger dan captaint shit[/quote] and [quote]I don't think this portrayed master chief well enough. He has shields, trained from a ten year old, knows only his duty, has survived countless encounters. What does captain america have? a Shield and the most egoistic name.[/quote]
-
1 ReplyWHAT? THE COMMENTS ON A YOUTUBE VIDEO... WERE RIDICULOUS? WHAT HAS THIS WORLD COME TO?
-
If you look up Caps abilities and then Chief's they are virtually the same.The armor the increases Chief's by a factor of 3. Cap bas fought, and won, against worse. John is a master at battlefield tactics and strategy, Cap is in the same, but his bad guys tended to be super-villains in one on one fist fights. So Cap has the edge on fighting ability. John wouldn't die as Cap kills very reluctantly, but he would be incapacitated. The problem with these debates is that people don't know comic-Cap's abilities.
-
The winner was chosen by voters
-
5 Repliesbrb defeating 8'+ tall technologically superior aliens with nothing but bare hands brb a spandex-totting guy on steroids beats him
-
fake master chief doesn't get defeated
-
Yeah... No. The chief has every possible advantage.
-
Aside from the decapitation at the end, and Chief firing from the hip right before it that isn't wholly inaccurate. Cap is just a better one on one fighter. Deal with it Fan Boys.
-
Can't say that I'm surprised.
-
1 ReplyEdited by Stalwart: 3/12/2014 1:52:38 PMThat actually makes sense. Very well done. The chief could only have lost that exact way. buuuuut the Chief is pretty much captain America... in an iron man suit.
-
Why is he wearing a Mark VI helmet and the Mark V chestplate?
-
2 RepliesAmerica always wins. Let that be a lesson to you, Viet Cong and North Vietnamese Army.
-
[i]Lame![/i]
-
ITV the comments section is full of 12 year olds.
-
3 RepliesEdited by Green Twister: 3/12/2014 2:11:34 PMArent captain america a spartan but without an proper tech armor ? voice acting needs to be better overall good movie
-
Man, caprain america sucks, no one can defeat master chief
-
-
1 ReplyEdited by lonepaul2441: 3/12/2014 2:10:23 PMYea that's quite literally impossible. Also why would the chief dodge bullets when he has shields? a 1940's super soldier in spandex with a shield, plus a weapon from the 21st century would have exactly 0% effect on the chief. The plasma grenade on the shield thing is the only likely thing to actually happen in a fight between the 2.......except a plasma grenade would not even be used. One punch killed ODST's without the armour on, what is one punch for the Captain going to do and yet he kept on fighting as if nothing happened. The Captain is weak as hell with a shield and gun.
-
3 Replies-__________________________-
-
1 ReplyHaha did you see the comment by "Chandler Flanders" ? [spoiler]I couldn't resist, had to do it.[/spoiler]
-
2 RepliesLool oh gosh the cringe. I think that was pretty accurate, Captain America would win.
-
1 ReplyI heard necular is the worst. My buddy got a very bad burn from 3 necular.
