{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/15/2014 11:15:06 PM
7
Ha. Haha. Hahahahahah. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH.
Oh, you're serious. If they are listening, they sure aren't doing anything about it.
English
-
But loot and guns got fixed:o They spent a minute changing a number from this to that. You can't seriously expect them to put more effort than that. What says more of a company caring about it's community than changing numbers and nothing more. Maybe invisible walls too. BUT ITS NOT SUPPOSED TO BE CONCRETE. ITS SUPPOSED TO BE BAD JUST LOOK AT OTHER BAD GAMES IM SURE YOULL UNDERSTAND THE EXCUSE BECAUSE OF OTHER BAD GAMES. WORK IN PROGRESS UHH DUHH DLC 2934$ FOR ONLY 9MB OF A BOSS AND THREE WAVES OF ENEMIES. UH PLACEHOLDER NAMES THAT ONLY NEED SPAWN ENEMIES = 3 IN OUR CODE
-
So uh, I mean, you DO realize that fixes and whatnot take time.....?
-
So uh, I mean, you DO realize what they've added is bleh (looking at you, queen's bounty).
-
I was leaning towards patches really, which is what he was talking about.
-
Oh, you mean the patches that nerf guns? I guess they're okay on that front. *eye roll*
-
So balancing is bad? Either you want them to work on the game or you don't.
-
I would prefer that they spend their resources correcting connection problems rather than nerfing weapons or cave spawns. To make matters worse the last patch jacked connectivity even more. It seems like polishing the brass on the Titanic…
