Golden Gun has been in a strange place in the Crucible and how it's been used in PvE. 3-Shot was an unpopular choice compared to the Six-Shooter in the Crucible and 3-shots is best in PvE. But since 3.0 came out 3-shot had a reasonable place in the Crucible now with its newly applied Damage-Resist and it seemed fair knowing 3 shots would only mean 3 kills (more if you line it perfectly.) Now Golden Gun for the first time ever in a long time is getting a nerf. 3-shot losing its Damage-Resist, while Six-shooter gaining Damage-Resist but shorter Super. I seriously do not understand the sense of it. Bungie love comparing Trials numbers with how it affects PvP, even though Golden Gun hardly exists in Trials and they don't like Seventh Columns happening Crucible. The nerfs being put down on the Patch notes is reverting Golden Gun back to its original and underwhelming form. Six-Shooter might be debatable but the reason for 3-shot nerf has no weight to stand on to direct a nerf. Being 'Calm and Precise' is not a value that would inquire a nerf, it's not broken nor unfair compared to all the other supers in the game that can eliminate triple the number than 3-shot Golden Gun. I am frustrated with this nerf, I play as an old D1 player and the Golden Gun was Iconic to the Hunter. But now Bungie is not understanding the rationality of Safe and Value in comparison: 3.0 Golden Gun: -6-Shot: Replenish ammo on Ignition, multiple kills, short Super span -3-Shot: Can penetrate through enemies, long super span (depending headshots at the time), Damage-Resist similar to other Roaming Supers, ONLY 3-Shots Both have Great and Fair Values, If you go Six-Shooter: you expect being weak on Super but have the potential to take out a lot of enemies. While 3-Shot has defense and only have 3-shot with good accuracy. It's almost like a Sacrifice but Bungie clearly doesn't see that......