{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/22/2019 11:46:17 AM
5
Gjallerhorn and icebreaker do not have a place because no one wants to go back to NEED GJALLERHORN or NEED icebreaker for raids.
English
-
My point is that we have so many powerful options in this game, I don't think we would ever truly NEED either. If anyone thinks otherwise, they'd be delusional. In D1, there wasn't much of a reason to take either of those off for the most part. Not really a problem here. Yes, Gjallarhorn is insane, but I doubt it would compete with Swarm plus tractor or even Mountaintop in terms of DPS or overall damage. Might be awesome for instantaneous damage, but that's it.
-
My bet would be that if we did get them...the catalysts would be. Faster regen for icebreaker or ammo back on crit kill. And more wolfpack rounds for gjally.
-
True. I mean, Icebreaker breaks the ammo economy anyways. Most would say it doesn't need to be here. But with rocket launchers the way they are, I don't think Gjally would be too bad. Yes, it would be the best rocket, as it should be, but I don't think it would be the best heavy all around unless Bungie rolled around some fat nerfs. Grenade launchers are like, 3 times more effective than rockets at the moment.
-
Thats because bungie nerfed rocket launchers. Maybe they will give us a void pinacle rocket weapon with seeker clusters next ?
-
They did nerf rockets. Then they buffed them, and they're still blah. I'd like to see a pinnacle Vanguard rocket honestly. Might be nice.
