{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/20/2016 8:32:04 PM
34
Its pretty -blam!-ed up. I dont get why they need to try to cover it up. We know hillary is a sketchy person. (I will be voting democratic) so is trump though. Im sick of all this who is the worse person. Lets just talk economics and social issues.
English
-
finally someone who uses their mind
-
I wish all political conversations could be like the one i had here 😥
-
[quote]Its pretty -blam!-ed up. I dont get why they need to try to cover it up. We know hillary is a sketchy person. (I will be voting democratic) so is trump though. Im sick of all this who is the worse person. Lets just talk economics and social issues.[/quote] If you want to talk economics and social issues Trump is your better choice.
-
Bearbeitet von TillersTouch: 10/21/2016 2:13:53 PMI had a civil economics dicussion if you want my opinion you can read it here. https://www.bungie.net/en/Forum/Post/216057132/0/0/1 If you want my views you can read it on there. I dont feel like debating today though, we wont change each others minds.
-
[quote]I had a civil economics dicussion if you want my opinion you can read it here. https://www.bungie.net/en/Forum/Post/216057132/0/0/1 If you want my views you can read it on there. I dont feel like debating today though, we wont change each others minds.[/quote] True that. Scotch or whiskey?
-
Tbh... im more of a coke and rum kind of guy. And to be really honest im more of a special brownie kind of guy. [spoiler]i mean hey i am a liberal[/spoiler]
-
[quote]Tbh... im more of a coke and rum kind of guy. And to be really honest im more of a special brownie kind of guy. [spoiler]i mean hey i am a liberal[/spoiler][/quote] Scotch it is then.
-
In your opinion yes, in mine no. Econmically you can make a case for democratic and republican economics.
-
Please stop trying to act like Trump is even 1/100th as corrupt as Hillary and her -blam!-ing shadow groups running around committing voter fraud, causing riots, and her biased ass media brainwashing the public Its not even -blam!-ing close
-
you watch FOX news, stop talking kid
-
Bearbeitet von Lukrativ88: 12/19/2016 9:53:02 PM
-
Bearbeitet von What: 10/21/2016 5:18:32 PMActually I dont. I dont really watch any major news channels unless something big happens Also, "Kid"? What kids watch fox News, idiot?
-
That fact that you refuse to acknowledge trumps corruptness shows youre the brainwashed one. Trump is running a compaign to inact policy to benefit himself. But whats the point of arguing youll remain ignorant and refuse to see how -blam!-ed up trump is. At least i can admit hillary is bad. Im not voting for her, im voting for democraric economics.
-
[quote]That fact that you refuse to acknowledge trumps corruptness shows youre the brainwashed one. Trump is running a compaign to inact policy to benefit himself. But whats the point of arguing youll remain ignorant and refuse to see how -blam!-ed up trump is. At least i can admit hillary is bad. Im not voting for her, im voting for democraric economics.[/quote] Democratic economics is immoral and illogical. Redistribution of wealth hurts the economy and is just plain theft. I'm sorry but you need to learn basic economics here read a book called wealth of a nation by Adam smith. Also a more current economist is milton friedman he died ten years ago but his lectures are on youtube Trump is wrong on his view of tarifs forcing jobs back but his tax cuts and deregulation are spot on what it does is create incentives for economic growth Hillary's plans are going to make more jobs move over seas this is a fact and it will create less competition in the market
-
https://www.bungie.net/en/Forum/Post/216057132/0/0/1
-
I don't see how that's relevant but here's my post on economics https://www.bungie.net/en/Forum/Post/216123638/0/0
-
Why read a book partial to one economic view when there are 2 either the economy self regulates or needs regulation. If you cant realize that theoretically both work you need to educate yourself. Ive taken economic courses i do understand it. Clearly you dont or youd acknowledge both views.
-
[quote]Why read a book partial to one economic view when there are 2 either the economy self regulates or needs regulation. If you cant realize that theoretically both work you need to educate yourself. Ive taken economic courses i do understand it. Clearly you dont or youd acknowledge both views.[/quote] No you haven't because if you had your teacher should be fired. If obama's lousy 1-2% growth doesn't prove that redistribution of wealth doesn't work and high regulation kills businesses especially small businesses then there's no saving you. Key is to always cut never raise under reagan we had on average 7% growth a quarter. Also refusing to read and learn from the world's most respected economists shows your lack of willingness to learn. Milton friedman won the Nobel price and Adam Smith saved England. Since wealth of a nation costs money just look up milton friedman on youtube and learn something it's free
-
Also you can't compare Obama's economic growth as a mark of democratic economics effectiveness because a lot of things that are necessary to stimulate that growth did not happen for example increasing the minimum wage.
-
[quote]Also you can't compare Obama's economic growth as a mark of democratic economics effectiveness because a lot of things that are necessary to stimulate that growth did not happen for example increasing the minimum wage.[/quote] Increasing the minimum wage hurts the economy in fact there shouldn't be a minimum wage you artificially raise wages you eliminate the demand for the worker
-
No because if people make moremoney they buy more products increase in demand causea a need for more products to be made which requires labor. Not to mention if a company is running efficiently they dont have extra workers so its not like they can just fire people. In a perfect world no min wage is needed because companies would pay what they should but they dont. And if this was a perfect free market jobs that pay to low no one would work forcing companies to pay more. The problem is people are so desperate to make money just to survive they take these jobs anyway. I already wrote all this out which is why i linked that post. Maybe you should actually read it you twat. I read your unitelligent post about trickle down and how it "works" which offer no real substance on why it works economically.
-
[quote]No because if people make moremoney they buy more products increase in demand causea a need for more products to be made which requires labor. Not to mention if a company is running efficiently they dont have extra workers so its not like they can just fire people. ----iether they'll fire, raise prices or do both or they'll go under In a perfect world no min wage is needed because companies would pay what they should but they dont. ----false just like supply and demand in sales there's supply and demand in labor which regulates wages. And if this was a perfect free market jobs that pay to low no one would work forcing companies to pay more. The problem is people are so desperate to make money just to survive they take these jobs anyway. ---so these jobs are worth it aren't they? What makes you decide what's too low? I already wrote all this out which is why i linked that post. Maybe you should actually read it you twat. I read your unitelligent post about trickle down and how it "works" which offer no real substance on why it works economically.[/quote] ----it's obvious you never took an economics course because trickle down economics is a buzz word it's called supply side and I bet you don't even know what it is it includes tax cuts for everyone not just the rich. You haven't a clue how a free market works low paying jobs are a way to get up in the workforce and are not supposed to be permanent, but you illiminate these jobs by a min wage we have less low skilled jobs because of it. Learn economics because you get an F atm
-
Also you can say I haven't taken courses but it doesn't change the fact I have and it doesn't make your case stronger. The difference between you and me is that I'm not ignorant enough to think that only one Theory works. I acknowledge that Republican economics does work I just think Democratic economic benefits more people and doesn't better job stimulating the economy.
-
[quote]Also you can say I haven't taken courses but it doesn't change the fact I have and it doesn't make your case stronger. The difference between you and me is that I'm not ignorant enough to think that only one Theory works. I acknowledge that Republican economics does work I just think Democratic economic benefits more people and doesn't better job stimulating the economy.[/quote] I can say you never took an economics course because you've never read wealth of a Nation which is standard in any economics course he was basically the birth of the free market
-
Also you can't just eliminate these jobs because they are necessities for the companies to run and operate
