Try PC gaming at 144 fps. 80 is too low for me now. I don't know how I'll ever be able to play xbox again
English
-
Bearbeitet von DUURJOB: 4/30/2016 7:41:57 PMYou literally can't see past 60fps. The difference is nonexistent
-
Yea.... u can
-
You most definitely can. Once you play 140 for a while 60 is way too slow. Although it's immeasurable, it's estimated good eyes see at 200+
-
I've seen games running at 1000fps. There's no difference
-
Bearbeitet von Mystic: 5/1/2016 9:30:02 AMNo monitor has a 1000hz refresh rate so it can't show that. If it could, you would definitely see a difference between 60 and 1000. Plus you have to have a monster of a computer to produce that many frames. Nice try though.
-
Bearbeitet von SuperStormDroid: 5/1/2016 7:53:09 PM[quote]No monitor has a 1000hz refresh rate so it can't show that. If it could, you would definitely see a difference between 60 and 1000. Plus you have to have a monster of a computer to produce that many frames. Nice try though.[/quote] Exactly. The average computer monitor has a refresh rate of 60hz. It's a known fact that if the frame rate is above the refresh rate of the monitor, it will cause screen tearing. To me, screen tearing is quite the annoyance.
-
Yeah, that's why I got a 144hz monitor, it's really nice. 100+ fps gaming is awesome
-
Actually that's not true at all. It's believed humans can see up to 1000 fps. The refresh rate of a monitor is what limits the fps you can see. If you have a 60hz TV or monitor anything above 60fps you will not notice. But a 120 fps on a 120 Hz monitor you can definitely tell the difference.
-
I've seen 1000 fps in games. There's no difference
-
You're lying. 1000 fps games don't exist nor does a 1000hz TV or monitor. But good try.
-
I'm not lying at all. I've seen it myself on a friends mega machine PC. Don't play dumb with me
-
1000fps on a 60hz screen = 60fps 1000fps on a 1000hz screen = 1000fps
-
There is not a single monitor that can display 1000fps. A $5000+ pc might be able to produce 1000fps, but the monitor will only show up to however much the monitor can display. It is literally impossible to be seeing 1000fps while gaming because there's no technology for it yet.
-
Whatever you say
-
Send me the link of a monitor that can game at 1000fps.
-
I would but I don't know monitors. Or PC techno mumbo jumbo
-
Then how can you be so confident that it's possible to game at 1000fps? [spoiler]P.S. it's not. Max is 240 (which is still very rare) and it's a huge difference from 60 [/spoiler]
-
Bearbeitet von DUURJOB: 5/3/2016 3:07:33 AMI go by my eyes. I don't let numbers rule my life like some people I've seen 240 as well. Nonexistent difference
-
Well then you must have bad eyesight because I game at 140 and it's a huge difference from 60.
-
I impress doctors with my eyesight. No issue there
-
I don't know what else to say other than your brain isn't able to process higher frame rates if you can't tell the difference between 60 and 240. I've read that different people with different amounts of "sight training" are able to perceive different frame rates. The average person sees at about 45 fps, whereas an average gamer would have a higher average of around 80. Farther up the spectrum, typical trained-fighter pilots can perceive 250+ fps. With that reasoning, I can see 140+ fps because my brain has been trained to be able to perceive it (I am actually a pilot in training so it makes sense). You, on the other hand, haven't experienced enough high speed situations (in my case simulations) to train your brain to perceive higher frame rates. To you, the difference is nonexistant. To me, the difference is everything.
-
Mhm. Gotcha. Go back to your basement now
-
Ah the usual condescending tone after running out of "facts" to argue with. Nice.
-
Ah the usual "hehe I wonnn" tone after talking a bunch of shit on the internet to make themselves feel special. Don't worry m8 you're special. Oh you're special all right...
-
I didn't talk shit, I gave you facts that there is a perceivable difference passed 60 fps. https://youtu.be/m6igZbQm75s More proof from a person other than myself in that video.