{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
1/13/2016 11:40:49 PM
4
The truth is there marginally healthier than conventional smoke, relatively odorless and the difference in taste is subjective.
I don't smoke tobacco but I know a lot of people who used them to try to quit only to have them replace conventional cigarettes so they're probably at least as addictive if not more because I think most of them actually have more nicotine per puff.
English
-
Not marginally. They still have a ton of stuff in them. Not good
-
Marginally healthier as in just barely not as bad for you as conventional smoke but still not "healthy" in any sense of the word.
-
Marginally? That margin is around 95% safer than smoking. No potassium nitrate, no carbon monoxide, no cyanide, no arsenic, no formaldehyde (unless you burn the oil way passed intended temperatures that causes dry hits.
-
You are correct, the concentration of nicotine is higher.
