{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/8/2015 9:32:05 PM
8
Killing off Dinklage better have been about the budget...
Because if you guys honestly thought North's performance was better, you really need your heads looking at.
Way to kill the mood, Bungie.
-
1 AntwortenMicrosoft Sam had a better personality than Dinklebot.
-
2 AntwortenThey just needed someone who was more available. At first you guys complained about dinklage being too bland and now there's more meaning in Norths voice and yet you still complain about it? I understand that it's a change and it's cringeworthy but you'll get used to it eventually.
-
7 AntwortenIt was either have Nolan North or Ghost be voiceless for yet another expansion.... Think smart please.
-
Bearbeitet von Soul_Eater_42: 9/9/2015 4:51:45 AMFor those of you who seem to live under a rock, the issue was [i]availability.[/i] Peter Dinklage simply wasn't as readily available as Nolan North. So they opted for Nolan North as the new voice of Ghost for the Taken King, replacing the old lines as well. Wouldn't make since for Ghost to have one voice for the vanilla missions, strikes, etc., then have him suddenly switch voices for Taken King content. Of course, North needs to work a bit more on his delivery of some lines. Better yet, Bungie could have at least modified the script a bit.
-
-
It's really bad.
-
all aboot whos available dinklebot was too busy sadly
-
They already said what it was about. Dinklage wasn't as available as north.
