{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/26/2014 11:59:10 PM
5
no destiny is a great fps. it will not survive 10 yrs with dlc. i think they have 3 years max. if they want to continue destiny there will have to be a destiny 2. wow had so much content, and even the expansion content was huge atleast 10x(probly much more) more then destiny. that's how they kept people for the full year until the next expansion.
English
-
Do you think the monthly subscription fee had a big part to play in the content they released and the regularity of said content? Do you think Destiny would be bringing more to the table if it required a monthly sub? *as a disclaimer, I do not support monthly subscription fees as a general rule of principle. Unless your getting consistent, interesting and immersive content on the regular, it wouldn't be with it. *
-
If you think about it the DLC comes out in December for 35$ + tax, the game will have been out 2 months and change which basically means were indirectly paying monthly for new content if they regularly release DLC with these gaps in-between expansions. So No I don't think we would have more than we already do, as they planned out milking us for quite abit.
-
35$ for both DLC, keep in mind
-
9$ a month then, 10$ if the DLC releases at 20$ individually.
-
On the regular, it wouldn't be WORTH it. Jeez spell check.
