-
One is PvP and the other is PvE against other players so more like PvEvP. Not the same thing at all. I'm pretty sure you don't want PvP nerfs or buffs to go over to gambit,right? So not the same thing.
-
you may think that they are different but the fact is when 2 gaurdians can kill eachother it is pvp whether the adds can still attack 1 of the 2 gaurdians or not is irrelevant. pvp nerfs will be applied to the conflict between the gaurdians. nerfs in pvp are applied as " against other gaurdians" if a nerf does go to only pvp it will still apply in gambit during the invasion battle. pvevp still contains pvp and pve.
-
You clearly don't know what people mean by PvP,not the technical definition of the words. Gambit is barley affected by PvP. So no you can't really put them in the same category. It's just a PvE activity with a slight twist, that doesn't make it PvP. But if you wanna discuss technical terms,go ahead. If you can't see the bigger picture I doubt I'll change your mind.
-
i do see the bigger picture. but ppl just wanna be right. so go ahead. when the next pvp nerf comes out read carefully .
-
I'm waiting for nerfs on PvP, especially supers. This post is only about separating active PvP player count to gambit players and PvP players. Won't affect either game mode,just gives a more realistic number of active players in the crucible. No idea why anyone would be against this.
-
i see. at this point the numbers are all low enough kindergardeners can count them all.
-
If so, please provide me with the numbers of crucible players and gambit players (separate) this week/today or yesterday. Cause that's what we're asking for. If it already exists then I apologize. Cause we all know the numbers are low, I'd just want to know how low they really are in crucible and if there's any hope at all, cause I match with the same 20 players daily it feels like.
-
i dont care enough to find out
-
Ley me save you the time, It doesn't exist. which is why we're asking for it. Have a nice day.