{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/29/2016 7:56:34 PM
1
The only part of this that was "proved" was that young voters are the majority of Sander's supporters, nothing more or less.
English
-
Then the majority of my statement holds water. I would go more indepth but the wifi here is worse than a whore's herpes.
-
Not really, at this point you're putting out irrelevant statements.
-
How so? Fear of college costs and ultra-liberal professors doing the same shite they do in Genders Studies courses to manipulate people to vote for a candidate is disgusting and illegitimate
-
Okay, continue to prove this then. I'm not finding any answers on that in any of the articles you provided.
-
Ofc, those articles were demographics by education and age only I tried to find a composite site, but apparently that doesn't exist for Colonel Sanders
-
Mhmm, boring. You have failed to show any backed evidence so far. Have a nice day.
-
That's because I don't the wifi capable of searching and proving my auxiliary points. Are you blind? You first accuse me of a red herring logical fallacy, which I haven't since I directly answer the question and then gave 2 reasons+ as to why not, and then you ask for a demographic of Bernie's supporters. I provided the support for my main point almost irrefutably and now you're saying I can't prove my point simply because I don't have the wifi capable to download documents that are relevant to your further Moving the Goal Posts (Special Pleading) logical fallacy. I said I will support my argument as I have [b]just[/b] done so what the hell is the issue? Can you not wait or do you have such a confirmation bias for your unsupported beliefs that you dismiss any argument for any reason in some weird form of a Strawman fallacy?
-
I seem to have struck a nerve. I like the use of actually looking up fallacies after I've declared that I was finished with the debate. Again, if you were so ever expanding knowledgable about "socratic debate" (which I now can sit back and laugh at) I have been able to establish that people get angry when they're tremendously wrong about a subject. Again, goodbye.
-
Also, you used a red herring fallacy yourself by proposing special qualities as a determinant for Sanders support other than my proposed and stated argument
-
Never did I say anything relevant to that. You brought up Sanders first.
-
Modificato da AurumPrimavera22: 2/29/2016 8:23:40 PMLol, angry? That's adorable I adore how you're so incredibly narcissistic and egotistical right now that you pretend to have the mystical ability of judging emotion on a device. Like honestly, this is how I speak. I'm very harshly spoken just like the minority of Canadians are, when they're not formal, from where I am. Also, note that I looked up what a red herring was and saw 4 different examples before commenting and have since reconfirmed my knowledge of the logical fallacies above.
