{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/12/2015 3:44:14 PM
14
Are both of these statements equally illogical?
Statement 1:
[spoiler]A person firing a gun into a crowd of unarmed individuals will have the same effect as if said shooter was using a knife/axe/bat/other similar item.[/spoiler]
Statement 2:
[spoiler]A person firing a gun into an unarmed crowd will have the same effect as if the same person was firing a gun into a crowd of people who were also armed with guns. [/spoiler]
Inb4 Replies are exactly the same as those of every gun control debate ever.
-
2 RisposteClearly, the first is more illogical. If some dude starts trying to batter a crowd,that I'm standing in, with a knife or bat.... I'm taking his ass down. In the second situation, to my mind the way it should be, said perpetrator won't even bother knowing that everyone else is packing and he won't stand a chance. Barring the suicidal types, obviously. In those cases he wants to die anyway so.... You know...
