JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Tema libero

Naviga in una tempesta di discussioni disparate.
12/23/2014 6:40:12 AM
4

Geometry was a lie?

So I took some things I learned in geometry and put them together only to have them contradict each other. So this is what I did... By definition, a square is a rhombus and a rectangle soooo... Square=rhombus And Square=rectangle But, by substitution property, you can substitute rectangle for square since square=rectangle soooo.... Rectangle=rhombus But by definition they are different. How can they be equal????

Lingua:

 

Fate i bravi. Prima di postare date un'occhiata al nostro codice di condotta. Annulla Modifica Crea squadra Invia

Visualizza l'intera discussione
  • Modificato da H2O: 12/23/2014 7:24:27 AM
    1
    They aren't equivalent. Every square is a rhombus and every square is a rectangle, but not every rhombus is a square and not every rectangle is a square. Thus: Rectangle =/= Square Rhombus =/= Square Rectangle =/= Rhombus

    Lingua:

     

    Fate i bravi. Prima di postare date un'occhiata al nostro codice di condotta. Annulla Modifica Crea squadra Invia

Non ti è permesso visualizzare questo contenuto.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon