{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
11/3/2014 7:30:49 PM
2
Dumb logic... 6 ppl shooting at 1 is harder than 1 shooting at 6??? You serious right now?
English
-
Yes logic. Look at the aspects 1 good player against 6 bad players. The one persons has the upper hand.
-
Yeah, you have at least 5 people to kill at any given moment. While it may be easier for them to kill you if they team up but let's be serious this is new era cod it's all lone wolf so that's not even a possibility. If you have skill that means you can lure and kill the team and rack up kills way faster simple because there are more of them. Use tactics Meg
-
You always have that many people to kill
-
But not usually all to yourself
-
That makes it harder.
-
No it really doesn't. You dumb? 1 vs 6 against an unorganized team. The 6 rush to the 1 single file "feeding" him kills. The 1 has 6 targets to kill. The 6 only have 1 target to kill. If they aren't working together the 1 has a huge advantage over the 6. Years of halo experience talking.
-
No. You're dumb. So shooting 3 ppl at one time is harder than shooting 1v1? Shut the -blam!- up.
-
You stupid? Not once was it 1 v 3. They were streaming to him single file.
-
You're clearly blind. He had them coming from both sides. #dismissed. Idiot
-
Modificato da JetEyeKnight: 11/4/2014 1:31:23 AMNo you moron, both sides but 1 at a time! Anyone could do that! In fact that's how I prefer it!
-
HEY IF YOU LIKE IT FROM BOTH SIDES THATS YOUR PERSONAL BUSINESS lmaooooo
-
There ya go being gay again, why don't you just come out of the closet
-
Live your truth
-
Well yea! You're not getting the point. All 6 are solely focused on one person. That one person is the only one that gets kills because HE IS ALONE. Without anyone else to distract them, the 6 are forced to go to that 1 person, increasing his odds of getting kills (as long as he isn't absolutely swarmed). I've always loved being outnumbered (not 6>1). Being one or two short is always a benefit.
-
They came 3 at a time he was surrounded. Point is irrelevant
-
Well at least I don't ever have to see a post from you again. That's refreshing
-
What was that?
-
Wrong. That increases the chance of running into multiple enemies at the same time with no backup. Which is what clearly happened.
-
You're a lost cause. Being outnumbered is better. It's been that way since Goldeneye on n64 Probably way before that
-
You do have a point, if the other team is not in a party and come at him 1 at a time it is easier since you don't have to worry about other dying. I usually play with a group so for me that would never happen to us.
