{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/24/2014 11:33:11 PM
19
-
then read the descriptions of each personality type and do some self analysis. problem solved.
-
Why do you think I think it's an unreliable test?
-
i could care less why you think so, maybe its the questions? but the descriptions of each personality type are accurate
-
Well yes the descriptions are but it definitely doesn't give you the right personality type. I wouldn't think I would have to explain that but apparently you are the one moron who commented on my comment
-
Modificato da Rogue4Lyfe: 8/30/2014 8:36:20 PMthats why i said do some self analysis. you don't have to use the test. i may be a moron but at least i aint a dumbass
-
I have done self analysis many times over even before I joined thing site you dumbass. I'm saying that I know the test is wrong because the description for the one I got and the self analysis were way off. If you f*ck*ng read an entire paragraph for once in your pathetic excuse for a life you would have seen that is what I was talking about from the start. You need to learn to read everything and not just the sentences. But what is also between the metaphorical lines of writing.
-
calling him a dumbass is kinda mean dont you think?
-
Why take bones that have been picked clean?
-
-
Modificato da Winters Darkseid: 8/26/2014 3:38:58 AMI take it as a general overview, rather than something concrete. It's a good reference for some tendencies, but I prefer the Enneagram. I find it far more insightful.
-
But the stats change so much in such little time it isn't reliable for that even
-
For some, yes. Jungian typology in general is somewhat flawed. Like I said, I find the Enneagram to be far more reliable. Still, the MBTI can be a good overview, provided the results remain consistent.
-
Well I only took it once, but I understand psychology enough to know it wasn't right for most of it.
-
I think he means that as far as MBTI tests go, this one is pretty bad.
-
Oh, I see. What I said still stands, though.
-
Yeah....
-
I went from ENTP to ENT_. 0% for the last one.
-
Me either. I've taken the Meyers-Briggs test like 3 times over the course of 2 years and I've gotten ISFJ, and having introversion be at 100%. This test gave me INFJ with introversion being at 49%. Also the description was a little off on this test.
-
Same here
