The thread isn't asking what asshole you could erase from history. Making obvious conclusions isn't victim blaming. Could an individual be our persecuted for being in a demographic if it doesn't exist? The answer is obviously no. It's the same for any other situation. Would a certain person have been murdered if they weren't at the place they were killed? No; does that mean that person is at fault for being killed? Of course not. It's not victim blaming, it's simple logic. Past actions influence future actions; one event can't happen if the previous one did not.