{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Questa discussione prende ispirazione da quest'altra: vedi post originale
5/23/2013 3:58:07 PM
52
Why is it when a Christian cuts heads off, he's "mentally ill"?
[url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/feb/18/jennifer-mills-westley-murder-trial]Sauce[/url]
I mean we have identical cases here. Instead it's a christian man, cutting off a person's head in the name of Jesus. Except we arrested him, instead of shooting him dead like we do most to most Radical Muslims. He's the definition of Radical Christian and we write him off as "mentally ill". Why don't we give Radical Muslims due process anymore? Have we gotten so used to calling them terrorists that they're automatically a threat with a political agenda the moment they scream ALLAHU AKBAR (God is great), deemed "enemy combatants" and we now can just deny them all their rights?
-
Modificato da Uncle Putin: 5/3/2014 3:30:15 PMBecause this is one isolated case and the terrorists are an organized and dangerous group of people hell bent on killing anyone who is American. They are both mentally ill, but the radical Muslims are much more dangerous to our society. Al Qaeda is an enemy combatant and the rules of war state that we don't have to give them due process if what they're doing are acts of war, and they are acts of war. They've even said that they've declared war on the great evil of the West.
