{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Questa discussione prende ispirazione da quest'altra: vedi post originale
5/23/2013 3:58:07 PM
52
Why is it when a Christian cuts heads off, he's "mentally ill"?
[url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/feb/18/jennifer-mills-westley-murder-trial]Sauce[/url]
I mean we have identical cases here. Instead it's a christian man, cutting off a person's head in the name of Jesus. Except we arrested him, instead of shooting him dead like we do most to most Radical Muslims. He's the definition of Radical Christian and we write him off as "mentally ill". Why don't we give Radical Muslims due process anymore? Have we gotten so used to calling them terrorists that they're automatically a threat with a political agenda the moment they scream ALLAHU AKBAR (God is great), deemed "enemy combatants" and we now can just deny them all their rights?
-
Modificato da RighteousTyrant: 5/24/2013 7:58:08 PMHere is, allegedly, a video of the shooting. Apologies for the quality. If you could, OP, please point out the time at which the officers had a chance to peacefully subdue the suspects. Was it before or after they were charging the officers' SUV with weapons in hand? Also, could you please describe how the situation that these officers found themselves in is at all comparable to arriving on-scene to find the suspect already retrained by others. If you could, specifically address how a previously-detained man is comparable to two men actively charging with weapons, because these two fact patterns strike me as being incomparable, but I wish to hear your side of things.
