Report away. If your report(s) are matched by a sufficient number of other member reports, then that post/content/user makes an entry in our docket. The charge is levelled (the post/content, the reporting reason, etc.) and a ninja then judges the case with a "guilty/innocent" verdict. If guilty, the content is removed and the user banned. If innocent, the defendant walks free. As to whether there is an evaluation of how many of a members reports result in a conviction or are thrown out of court? I don't know. The old site had a "trust system" that was based on multiple metrics. The web-team are clever enough to factor in some sort of "trustee rating" that values one member's reports over another. Whether or not there's something like that in play? I have no earthly idea. I can imagine it, I could roughly guess how it would work, but I wouldn't know and couldn't tell (since I have no insight into how the system functions, except from my limited perspective) if it exists. Either way, I would recommend that you report when you think something is wrong. As long as you're operating in good faith, if there is such a system, you can only benefit from it. Those who would attempt shenanigans or exploits? If there is such a system, it would also note and deal with their efforts.