{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/11/2013 11:44:27 PM
16
Republicans fund more science programs than Democrats.
I posted this earlier in a thread where people didn't read up on their sources or information, but I thought this was worthy of it's own thread.
The claim that Republicans are anti science is a claim born of ignorance. I hope you enjoy the video, and comment.
English
#Offtopic
-
4 RisposteThe National Science Foundation's budget has gone up ([url=http://www.nsf.gov/about/budget/]by 800 million dollars[/url]) under Obama, so that point is out. The National Institute of Health's budget has gone up (from [url=http://www.nih.gov/about/director/budgetrequest/fy2008directorsbudgetrequest.htm]28.9 billion[/url] to [url=http://officeofbudget.od.nih.gov/pdfs/FY13/FY2013_Overview.pdf]30.9 billion[/url]) under Obama, so that point's out. Republicans are always the ones who suggest Intelligent Design being taught in schools, never Democrats. So that's an awful mark against Republicans. The NASA budget is a problem, I'll give him that, but it went down from the beginning of Bush's first term to the end of his last; I'm not talking money, I'm talking % of the Federal Budget. [[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budget_of_NASA]Source[/url]]
