Everyone at 343i should be fired, they've had their chance. Ms should open 2401i and have them continue.

Spartan Ops needs to die. The way Halo 4 is going, Halo 5 is going to be predominantly MP. RIP exploration RIP skull hunting RIP campaign theater, scoring, Co-op scaling RIP AI collecting, megabattles RIP easter eggs (because 343 make crap easter eggs)

DMR. That is all. It should not be able to trump and gun to start with. I only ever beat it with the LR at long range.

What do you get when you combine a wide spectrum of people from various disciplines and styles who have never worked with one another with poor direction, a strict timeline, and massive expectations? What you get is is a big pile of shit in a golden wrapper. Inconsistent is the word I would use to describe it, as there is a massive contrast in the spectrum of quality as far as this game is concerned - sure, the golden wrapper is shiny from afar, but up close you can tell it's just a cheap shiny wrapper. As for the shit, well, I think a lot of it speaks for itself. It's the lowest of lows and the shortest of highs. It's a case of too many cut corners, and far too many problems in almost every aspect of its design. It's garnered so much praise at its release, and then its reception proceeded to swan dive face first into the pavement to follow up. It's a damn shame, and I'm ashamed to have bought into the promise of a quality product. I should have trusted my intuition and opted to not purchase it, instead maybe grabbing some pizzas and snacks. Whatever, what's done is done - I don't really care. As for the condition of the game, it's probably collecting dust somewhere, but like I said, I don't really care. Maybe one day I'll decide to play it again. In the event that happens, I'm sure it'll just end up back in some dusty corner of my home, forgotten. I honestly couldn't care any less about it.

I can't believe they actually ban people for criticizing their game, that is truly a sign of insecurity about it's content. A good developer should accept the criticism and improve the game, or disagree (politely) with the criticism and explain why.

CSR?

So you're complaining that you're not getting something as quickly as you'd like? Such a sad story.

Why do they acknowledge how overpowered the Incinerator Cannon, the Boltshot, the DMR, Sticky Grenades, and etc. are but to not try to fix it? And now they're glorifying camping! If they wonder why their population is so compared to other Halo games, then I can only pity their ignorance. I regret buying this game.

YESH! Grifball!

[quote]I bet I COULD CODE IT SO IT'S IN GAME BY APRIL. [/quote] Go ahead and try it. And fix all the other more pressing issues with the game while you're at it. I'll expect an update once a month on your progress.

Halo 4 is bad and if you play it you are a bad person.

Here's what I don't get from the "competitive" community of Halo. They want incentive to play. They're getting a ranking system but can't be bothered to check an external app or web page to see their rank? If people care enough of their rank, they'll check the site often to see how they're progressing and stat checking. Aside from convenience, how is that bad?

Notice how the CSR is coming out once they're done with all the DLC, -blam!- you 343 and everything you stand for, you're single handedly ruining Halo's multiplayer.

>Ranking system coming in January >Ranking system now coming in April wut