JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Tema libero

Naviga in una tempesta di discussioni disparate.
1/22/2013 4:00:50 PM
7

Wikipedia makes list of Hoaxes posted on the site

Well that's quite a big list, I guess it proves you can't believing everything you read on there. I still use it to research or look up a topic since a good 95% of it is fact. (Backed by Encyclopedia Britannica) What do you guys think? Found any good hoaxes in the list or somewhere else?

Lingua:

 

Fate i bravi. Prima di postare date un'occhiata al nostro codice di condotta. Annulla Modifica Crea squadra Invia

Visualizza l'intera discussione
  • This is why you NEVER use wikipedia directly for a source. Th trick is to go onto wikipedia, find your article, and then click the link to the source. Provided that its a good source (use best judgement) then use it. But never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never use wkipedia as a direct source. I know several professors that fail a paper, regardless of quality, if they see wikipedia in the bibliography.

    Lingua:

     

    Fate i bravi. Prima di postare date un'occhiata al nostro codice di condotta. Annulla Modifica Crea squadra Invia

Non ti è permesso visualizzare questo contenuto.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon