We've all heard this arguement: "where will it end?" This question peaked my interest when i was listening to a gun control debate, one side was saying "if we ban assault rifles, will they just go after hunting weapons next" and the other was saying "if we allow assault rifles, are we going to give people rocket launcher's next?" and so on so on. That is a particularly rediculous example, but i have never heard a slippery slope arguement that actually raised reasonable concerns. So does this form of arguement ever actually mean anything or is it just sensationalist nonsense?