{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
12/24/2017 5:54:06 PM
1
And feeding everyone is? You cant help those that cant help themselves... You can however save your people from the hands of greed and the two most often coincide. Capitalism in general, which is the underlying issue to both hunger and loot boxes, should be regulated. So on the surface yes starvation is worse than microtransactions but they are two heads to the same demon. Kill one and the other still lives, kill the demon and they both die. We could feed the hungry and poor but they wont pay us. In a world that worships money humanity is dead.
English
-
Yes, it is. That is one of the main goals of the charter for the United Nations. This issue would better be handled by the FCC rather than the UN. Lets use the right tool for the job.
-
So people who cant feed themselves is more important than protecting the consumer from the corruption of free market? "The UN Charter sets out four main purposes: Maintaining worldwide peace and security. Developing relations among nations. Fostering cooperation between nations in order to solve economic, social, cultural, or humanitarian international problems."
