{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/26/2016 2:34:36 AM
2
-
Nope. It's holding an objective. What's not fun, is getting shot in the back because some retard on your team flipped the spawns.
-
What, winning is boring?
-
Idc about winning I wanna play the game Camping around two zones isn't my idea of fun
-
No need to camp, chief, there's a lot of running back & forth defending as the other team attacks. It's called "holding zones". Don't know if you've heard of it. By most definitions, winning is more fun than losing.
-
Fun isn't determined by winning in any definition Would you like games that you automatically won as soon as you landed? Would games where the enemy team just quit as soon as the game started be fun?
-
[quote]Fun isn't determined by winning in every definition [/quote]fixed Of course not, in those two improbable cases you mention. But those have only happened to me twice. And those were still more fun than playing my hardest, doing everything right, earning a positive KD, yet still taking a loss because of the randoms on my team who were playing "for fun" instead of following the smart strategy, thus seizing defeat from the jaws of victory.
