{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/25/2016 10:09:52 AM
5
False. Anyone who plays control with a brain knows that your main goal is to control two zones. It DOES NOT matter what the spawns are. Deal with it you just cant adapt
English
-
Apparently you don't know shores of time. Control point A is a death sentence
-
IDK about that. I've won games controlling both A and B
-
I have played since beta shores of time is one of my favorite times and A is way better than C it is significantly closer to B And you control the major side of the map
-
-
Outrageous comment speaking against the wisdom of the masses (which is derived from a handful of streamers). I agree, if a is free and you hold b already, cap it. Push the enemy back towards that c/b zone and farm those points. The problem comes when people cap the zone and camp it. If you get a 2 zone advantage on that map you need to press the enemy and capitalise, especially if it's a/b under control. Honestly people who complain about capping a are probably the same ones who end games with 30 kills and 1 capture. Not in all cases, but most, I suspect. Harms their kd if they don't know an enemy might be approaching from behind.
