I got hate mail from salvage. (This is after the second High RoF auto nerf) One of the biggest morons I've ever met. We were on The Drifter- an ultra close range map. He was running No Backup Plans and Universal (noob shotgunner loadout) and so I chose doctrine and Invective to counter him. I went 26 and 8, and was immediately told I only won because I used Doctrine. I asked him: "what sense would it make for me to use a weapon that lets you get close," and he replied by saying I should use another weapon to kill him. He claimed doctrine is easy mode while running Universal and NBUP as a Titan (I am one too, I know what it takes- not much) Now here's where the idiocy kicks in. I killed him [b]16 out of the 26 times[/b] I killed someone, and killed him with invective 12 times. Only killed him with Doctrine 4 times (his buddies were a different story though). I told him that I killed him with Invective too. He says back to this, I kid you not: "But that one time, I was low on health." In which I proceeded to tell him the amount of times I killed him with it. This sort of thing went on and on. He caught more L's than Meek Mill in Back to Back. Then I said: "name a weapon and I'll destroy you with it," because he kept trying to prove that I'm terrible if I don't use DoP and Invective- to clearly no avail. So he says No-Land Beyond, assuming that I have no skill with that either (mistake #10378 in my book of Things Idiots Say on my laptop). I told him "I just looked at my stats and I already have more kills in PvP than you with it, and I just started practicing last week." He just quit soon after I told him that, whining about how I'm missing a point, and I can't handle using other weapons.... and it felt really good. At least he conceded defeat like a man, player to player. It took him 25 minutes to realize he wouldn't win an argument of weapon choice when he didn't show the skill necessary in game to prove he could do good with anything, especially a super easy loadout. I won't ever forget that.