{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
11/14/2015 2:10:35 AM
58
Look at what happens when you have a gun fee country. If they had guns 10 would be dead [b]AT MOST!! [/b] this is sickening, ISIS even told that they will attack via immigration, Europe has been fretting shit tons of Muslim immigration and look what just happened, an organized ISIS attack on places where they knew they would meet hardly any resistance.
English
-
This has nothing to do with guns. It's terrorism as a result of domestic policy.
-
Because more guns are always the answer. Got a problem with guns, well give it more guns! That'll solve it real good. Grow up you fool. Look at places like Australia strict gun laws and very few gun related incidents. This means terrorists are less likely to be armed. Also how many bloody high school shooting happen in America? If there weren't guns they wouldn't be 'shootings' they'd be normal schools.
-
You realize France is fun free? School shootings happen because they are fun free zones
-
That bait is way too obvious man.
-
Yo think this shot would happen in Sweden? No the -blam!-ing pussies would get popped before being able to do real dumb because the people there know the importance of guns
-
Modificato da aceebro: 11/14/2015 7:26:02 AMBecause handgun beats assault weapon + ballistic vest + explosive devices. Yep.
-
Easily, this isn't a video game
-
-
How could this be interpreted as bait?
-
Because it's stupid and based on probability.
-
No it isn't.
-
Yeah, it is. There's factually no way of knowing that a civilian with a handgun could've overpowered a hardened militant armed to the teeth with assault weapons and explosives
-
Modificato da Nverted-Angel: 11/14/2015 3:14:54 PMThat's the point, it isn't a "civilian with a handgun" nor is it a militant armed to the teeth. Stop being stupid.
-
That's exactly what it is, you've been misinformed if you think otherwise. Maybe you should go read up on the situation a little more
-
They hate Americans more, can you imagine what it would be like here. All of the undercover ISIS members here throwing off their sheep's clothing and slaughtering thousands of people for no reason. This is the End.
-
They won't do anything big to America. They get all their supplies from us indirectly and we're preventing people from actually doing something about them.
-
Gun beats bomb?
-
Easily. How is one terrorist going to get s bomb to harm people when scores have lethal ranged weapons to defend themselves.
-
It has to be assumed they were taken unawares
-
And? Are you saying that they would still have been taken hostage and executed?
-
I was under the impression that the bombs did most of the damage
-
Do you think it's a movie? Bombs were only used as a fear tactic, over 1,000 were taken hostage.
-
In fairness I don't know how it went down, and an armed audience probably would have slowed them down, but then they wouldn't have done as they did should that have been the case so it's difficult to draw direct comparison.
-
It likely wouldn't have happened at all of they new people were armed.
-
Not in this manner, no. That's not to say they wouldn't have hatched a different plot, but beyond that it's pure speculation.
