Ok, so rule number 1 in internet debating is point out grammatical errors to discredit the author from any valid point. Ok grammer [url=http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law]-godwinslaw!-[/url] you win, you can validate yourself as well due to your internet research skills. However your research still proved that my statement is true. No matter the percentages, they got paid a flat percentage. As did Activision and the other shareholders. You skipped over my point that Destiny is flat out a shooter with more cut scenes. Battlefield and Call of Duty have a tried and true recipe for yearly success that does not submit its playernase to a ridiculous RNG system or time locked content and try to convince the masses that its for our own good. Because we as consumers mow through content. I played all the Halos and Battlefield and Call of Duty franchises. My issue was that Destiny provides artificial barriers as "content" when they actually get "paid" for releasing DLC. Which they also cut up and give it to us in parts, yeah.... Thats content. If I was a shareholder I would be worried that this business practice goes against traditional practices shown by battlefield and Call of Duty franchises that are successful. Either way, ill also man up and say I was in a foul mood after rng in raids today. I apologise for being a dick.