{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/11/2015 12:22:47 PM
1
Its an opinion buddy no need to insult. I just think nolan was better n dinklage sounded lifeless . Robot or not who really felt a connection with the ghost character? Im no actor but u still have to convince me n I wasn't convinced with dinklage voice. Soooo like I said it's my opinion. Have a good day
English
-
I'm sorry but I didn't "insult" you, I simply stated the obvious and said you don't know acting. Do you actually know who Peter Dinklage is? Have you even seen Game of Thrones? Peter Dinklage played it "flat" because he is a tiny robot companion, and he added just enough subtle mood and humour to make you like him and feel more of the panic in the scene. But yes you can have your opinion, I can't take it off you, but if you think Nolan did a good job then I'm extremely sorry but you obviously have no clue what you are talking about. =P
-
Peter dinklage being in game of thrones doesnt give him an automatic pass . U obviously are a fan of peter n I actually think hes an excellent actor but! He didnt do a good job on this script. Period
-
I meant that if you know who he is then you understand the personality of his acting. And his performance in Destiny showed that same character of subtle dry humour and was Ominous. It was just fine as it was. Ok it wasn't perfect but now its ruined, completely, not just slightly flat.
