A couple points. A) this game has very little graphic depictions of gore. B) it has no profanity in the campaign. (Words have no meaning until you gave them one. A little kid doesn't know what -blam!- is until it is given any value) C) 18+ is a rating reserved for the goriest, most profane, sexually explicity, and traumatic games. Even call of duty has an M rating as opposed to an A rating. D) minecraft has swords. Should it be 17+? E) the games cause an [u][b]immediate frustration[/b][/u]. This frustration is found in even puzzle games. Video games do not cause violence. They cause frustration for not being good at something F) little kids swear. They are immature. They most likely learned those words from their older siblings and told their friends. G) the internet actually grows social behavoir. To do raids, they need to meet people. Unless they are in patrol or doing the campaign, they will be playing with many people. This encourages social behavoirs. H) 10 year olds aren't allowed to play. It's ages 13+. I) I hope to god that this is satire with the 2+ year sentence J) how weak do you think the mind is? You are attacking a game that has no profanity (players don't count) no sexual content, no drugs or alcohol, no gore, or anything that would give it a M (mature 17+, the standard for shooter games) rating yet you want it to be rated A (adult 18+. Almost unused)