You're one to talk. You base your view of existence on the writings of an old book. When asked to defend your points, you give quotes from the book. When asked to prove that the book is a valid source, you respond that the book tells you not to defend your position to those that do not follow the book. When asked why you won't defend your position, you simply say that the other person is wrong and you are right, and that they are blind to reason for disagreeing with you despite the fact that you have given no logical arguments to support your position. I'm not quite sure you even know what logic is.