{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/24/2015 2:29:38 PM
36
Huh? That is the point of being atheist. We don't need to come up with any arguments. The burden of proof is on Christians, not us. So get back to us when you have some facts to back you up. Otherwise have fun making a fool of yourself as you skirt the issue and project what you're doing on others.
English
-
I want to prove you wrong so badly, but your head is shoved so far up your ass I won't even bother
-
Ahhh, I'm sorry you're butt hurt that you don't know how to disprove me.
-
YOU WONT PROVE HIM WRONG BECAUSE YOU CANT
-
If you make a claim, which is there is no god, you must prove that it is physically impossible for a god to exist. Whomever makes the assertion must provide evidence.
-
The burden of proof only applies to positive claims because proving a negative is impossible. Until proven, it shouldn't be regarded as true.
-
You are the one making the claim that there is no God, so please, present the evidence you have that shows that there is no way a higher being could have made this world and your life. Any claim should have evidence, not "they can't prove their side so I'm right". Just because we can't prove who or what created the universe doesn't mean that there is no God.
-
I can't disprove God's existence. Based on that statement, what conclusion can we come to?
-
A* It means that we obviously don't know enough about life or the universe to make any baseless assumptions. My point? Live and let live.
-
We do know that God is logically impossible. Doesn't that disprove him?
-
[quote] (in certain other religions) a superhuman being or spirit worshiped as having power over nature or human fortunes; a deity.[/quote] So you're saying there's nothing in this universe that has control over nature? That's a bold assertion.
-
Something might be in control but we don't know.
-
That's the definition of a god
-
"We don't know" is the definition of a god?
-
Ok, allow me to "disprove" God per say. Currently there is no scientific evidence to support a god, therefore no scientific evidence is needed to refute his existence. Does that work for you? If not than your going to need to specify what your definition of God is.
-
Look at Google, then look at the non-religious definition. There is scientific evidence of aliens, so who knows? Maybe there is a race out there that could classify as a God.
-
Oh ok I see what you're saying now. Well if evidence comes up of these godlike aliens then get back to me and I'll switch from agnostic atheist to whatever the religion of these aliens is called.
-
Maybe way back when one of them came to earth and spoke to the humans, creating the bible/Koran or whatever and then people just added stuff in
-
That's what theist don't seem to understand. We aren't asserting anything. We are denying your assertion. You know how you deny Islam, Buddhism and all the other religions? Well so do I, I just include yours as well. But according to you, is it not only up to Christianity to prove its own religion as true, but disprove all the others as well? I don't see them doing that, I just see them making their own claims.
-
There could very well be aliens who created the universe and have supernatural powers we will never understand. That constitutes as a God.
-
And the exact same goes for Christian. Which they cannot do.
-
Did I ever say anything about Christians? We're talking about atheist's hypocrisy here.
-
I'm talking about the hypocrisy of both sides. The OP's post is the best example of this. Is does nothing to validate his point in any fashion. It's a wild claim. Christians are good at those.
-
OP's post has next to nothing to do with mine
-
OP's post was talking about atheists not being able to back up their argument. Therefore making them hypocrites. You stated that you were talking about "atheists hypocrisies." That's the same shit m80.
-
The point--------> Your head.
