Both situations are similar in that you have to pay $130 to get the full destiny game and $100 to get the full metal gear solid game. Yeah the phantom pain looks like a good game and the taken king looks like it has more than enough content to justify the price. GZ was nothing less of a cash grab, but destiny's DLC was made with an effort to improve. That's why TDB had a consisted storyline even if the DLC as a whole was not very good, they were at least trying to improve. They also improved with HoW. Phantom pain was just an easy way to make money off of the hype of the game, similar to how destiny made most of its money off of hype. Neither companies should be defended for those actions. What's bad is that when someone says they're looking forward to TTK they're reminded of the $90 beta before this DLCs release but when someone says they're looking forward to the phantom pain everybody is commenting "yeah me too" or "it's going to be the best game ever", nothing about the GZ demo that people played for. Nobody should get hate for liking a game, and it's especially bad when only one game is called out for something that other games have done.