This is what I was coming to in our discussion. If your only objection is the word we use to describe it (let's mash together the word 'gay' and 'marriage' and call it garriage) then you are actually supporting limiting someone's rights [b]over a word[/b]. That is truly ludicrous, and should be obviously so to you. If they are allowed the same rights, the [b]name[/b] of their union is the only difference, and all of a sudden we can see how petty your objections are.