So... I'm really not sure how you can display this level of confusion over a subject you seem to have actually read about. 1. You stated before that abiogenesis is evolutionary (?). This statement needs explanation. Evolutionary basically means something explains the diversity of species through natural selection. Abiogenesis is how life started. Evolution is an answer whereas abiogenesis is a separate question. Life arising for the first time can't be explained in terms of how life diverged once it existed. That simply doesn't make any sense. You must know this if you've actually done reading on the subject. 2. As for them both being atheistic, that's a strange thing to say. Neither say anything about god claims at all. Sure, both could fit into an atheistic view, but not exclusively - evolution is widely accepted in many religions too. That doesn't mean you'd call it theistic either. Im currently trying to work out whether you know you're being dishonest or not, because I don't see how you could have made such a basic and seemingly deliberate error. If you respond please stick to point 1, your conflation if evolution and abiogenesis, it might help to look at the confusion there first of all.