[quote]To suppose that the eye, with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest possible degree.[/quote] This is where all creationists stop. But he continues to say... [quote]Yet reason tells me, that if numerous gradations from a perfect and complex eye to one very imperfect and simple, each grade being useful to its possessor, can be shown to exist; if further, the eye does vary ever so slightly, and the variations be inherited, [b][i][u]which is certainly the case [/u][/i][/b]; and if any variation or modification in the organ be ever useful to an animal under changing conditions of life, then the difficulty of believing that a perfect and complex eye could be formed by natural selection, though insuperable by our imagination, can hardly be considered real.[/quote]

Haha you are the one making the claim that in Darwins own words he disproves evolution. So I'm going to enjoy you proving yourself wrong by reading what he says after that. Just google it if you need to.

Why would I want to read darwins theory of delusion when all I have to do is point out our food supply so the trees when they evolved were intelligent enough to provide us with nourishment.sure nice one Darwin