[b]I WANT IT TO BE CLEAR I AM NOT TRYING TO OFFEND ANYONE MY QUESTION AT THE BOTTOM IS GENUINE.[/b] I am just trying to understand the logic behind some of the things people believe and i know that will vary person to person. So the general consensus from everyone is: [b][u]No aliens wouldn't go against religion because they aren't mentioned specifically. [/u][/b]I have seen a minority case of religions could have misinterpreted aliens so that should also be considered. With that being said i have a few more questions but first: 1) People don't have a negative response to the question of aliens in regards to religion. 2) We have no clue if aliens actually exist. 3) We can't prove they exist as of now that i am aware of. 4) The logic with aliens is because scripture doesn't specifically touch upon them they could exist. So my question is: Why do theist get offended when atheist use the "disprove my unicorn" argument? With the logic of #4 wouldn't they be just as likely to exist as aliens, Big Foot, etc? I understand tensions can get high in an argument and maybe its just the fact that its questioning God's existence but how do you guys feel about that?