Evolution is neither a fact nor a scientific law. It is a theory based on a hypothesis born almost 2000 years ago. It's a theory, and the Law of Thermodynamics is that, a law that can be hypothesized, experimented, observed, and concluded. Both terms can't coexist because their logic conflicts. Evolution can only be hypothesized; thus, it can't be considered a fact without repeatable experimentation and observation. Another thing, let's all assume Evolution is true. Let's say that in the assumed scenario, some creature is presently evolving. Let's say a fish was developing an extra leg so that it's future generation would have to walk on land. What will happen to the fish? Being that the creature is no longer stream lined, it will become a product of another evolutionary phrase, "Survival of the Fittest," in which only the physical fit survive. Since the creature is at a physical disadvantage, it is not only likely that it would be rejected among its kind for procreation, but it would also be endangered by the carnivorous higher beasts that feed off of that kind; thus, evolution is apparently a contradictory fact in it of itself (where two terms acclaimed to be true are apparently contradicting each other when there poorly seen by evolutionists as logical proof).