No. Circumcision is mutilation. Unless medically necessary, circumcision is a barbaric, cruel, excrus painful, and ultimately [i]cosmetic[/i] procedure. The "benefits" don't justify the immense pain and suffering the baby goes through, and are meaningless in a hygenic society. The baby has no say in whether he wants the procedure or not, and he most certainly can't consent to it. Before you say, "Well, it should be the parents decision!", would you support parents cutting off a baby's earlobes? "But nobody would do it to themselves if they were older, so it's better if it's done when he won't remember it, right?" -blam!- no, it isn't better. If an informed adult wouldn't do it to himself, then why in the blue hell would you subject an infant to it? The rest of the arguments supporting circumcision ultimately revolve around the cosmetic factor. "Oh, well, [i]I[/i] think a circumcised dick looks better." Well, good for you, I don't care. If your argument revolves around that, then quite frankly you don't have a leg to stand on. Now if an informed adult wants to have the procedure, then I don't have a problem with it. I disagree with it, but it's his choice.