{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/9/2016 5:33:12 AM
7
Almost 2 years ago.
Year 3 starts later this year, not ends.
English
-
And we'll probably see more of the traveler and the exo stranger in Destiny 2
-
Destiny 2 should have already been here. Bungie's original plan for the release schedule of Destiny was: 2013 - Major Title Release Minor DLC 2014 - Comet Launch (Major DLC) Minor DLC ...Repeat... That process would take two years before they released Destiny 2. That means that we should have gotten Destiny 2 last year instead of The Taken King
-
No, we should be getting Destiny 2 this September instead of RoI. They pushed D2 back to 2017 (hopefully April time?) and are giving us RoI in its place.
-
That was leaked, that was obviously subject to change
-
I'm not arguing against that. I'm saying that the game itself has been out for two years, unlike the three you mentioned in your post.
-
"...almost three years ago..." Regardless of the age of Destiny, we still haven't had any progression in the major plot to the game in a long time
-
Again. Not disagreeing with that fact. I only wanted to correct you before too many people started yelling through their keyboard
